| DonFerrari said: Sorry but even if the Pokémon is handled by a specific company it still rolls back to Nintendo. They have the final control and if they do nothing is because they are in agreement.
This is the same poor excuse used on Nintendo sole partner bad pratices in South America being overlooked by fans because Nintendo have no control of the pratices the partner used.
Where am I using double standards? Have you seem me deny credit for Nintendo because it was produced by an owned company? You are the one using it to and excusing others because "others do".
Turma da Mônica is released world wide for a while (even china have received it). Your lack of knowledge doesn't make it obscure. And there are some other big companies from Brazil that if you don't know you are quite bad informed. InBev, Vale, Petrobras, Embraer, Tam (Latam), Itaú, etc all being top players on their field. Would you say Machado de Assis is obscure or Paulo Coelho? |
I'm aware of those companies especially the likes of Inbev who from what I recall was a Belguim based company who merged with Ambev, I'm quite well informed I just find it laughable that you'd think that all these companies from differing industries would operate in the same manner and that Nintendo should as well. It's also hilarious that you can't seem to understand the concept of what a brand management firm do and how they operate, you think a company sets up a brand management company so they can still dictate all aspects of the brand they want managed? Lol, Nintendo only need to step in when the brand begins losing money which as the franchises history goes doesn't seem to be anytime soon, brand management companies are given full run of what they're put in charge of.
