By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
DonFerrari said:


And you truly believe just because Nintendo created a company to manage the brand they get no say or it stops being them but represented? I'll be damned if Nintendo wouldn't intervene if they weren't satisfied, it's one of their golden IP.

 

In Brazil Maurício de Souza company have iron clam in any licensed products with Turma da Mônica on it and determines all the quality Standards and contract. I doubt Nintendo don't have the same control over it. Seems like the other thread that blaimed game freaks and totally exemped ninty on Pokémon rehashing problems. Some Nintendo fans don't accept any criticism torwards the company.


Considering how much money they've made on the brand shows that the created company are doing a good job so why would Nintendo query their actions, the anime alone is one of the most successful animated shows in history as well as the cards raking in massive amounts of profits. If the appointed company are doing a great job then Nintendo don't have to babysit them, the said company are the one who have created the Pokken collaboration with Namco, companies don't have to work like this obscure Brazilian company and tbh working in the financial markets myself Brazilian companies aren't the best example to use now days.

Some people just want to attack Nintendo over anything when they desperately can, when a first party studio like Monolith make Xenoblade people don't see it as Nintendo despite the IP being theirs so why should Gamefreak be exempt from this thinking when handling Nintendo's other IP.

I'm not even saying they should change, but that ninty certainly have a control over the anime even if they don't exert it.

Maurício de Souza is hardly obscure... the biggest HQ company in country.

So your justification for exempting nintendo from pokemon mistakes is because some people don't credit nintendo for xenoblade??? Makes sense, but not.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."