By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran on 21 January 2015
Edit Thread
estebxx said:
BraLoD said:
HBninjaX said:
Bloodborne

I have this love hate relationship with Sony balogne

How come?
Bloodborne is not a sequel to Dark Souls, and the franchise was born into PS exclusivity as well with Demon's Souls, Bloodborne doesn't fit here IMO.

i was going to make this same reply, glad you made it XD.

also just as you said this isnt a sequel to Dark Souls its a new ip and Sony is the one that contacted From Software to make the game years ago, it literally wouldnt exist if it wasnt for Sony, PLUS there are hints that (despite the different name) this might actually be a sequel to Demons Souls.

also how is a new exclusive Souls game for Sony something bad when the whole franchise was born on the PS3 with a PS3 EXCLUSIVE game called Demons Souls... and the majority of the fanbase has ben on PS since the beginning, or even before the beginning since sony had the exclusive Kings Field games as well.

Bloodborne is a spiritual succesor to the Souls series. Google metaseries.

I see people claiming all the time that Xenoblade Chronicles X is not a new IP, but it is. It's a spiritual sucessor to Xenoblade Chronicles, it doesn't take place in the same world.

Xenoblade Chronicles and Xenoblade Chronicles X are all part of the Xeno metaseries. Demon Souls, Dark Souls 1 & 2 and Bloodborne are all part of the Souls metaseries.