Euphoria14 said:
Soundwave said:
Euphoria14 said:
| Soundwave said:
Well that and EA already has the rights to the Star Wars games, so I'd assume Nintendo wouldn't be allowed to use that either.
Still it'd be worth it just for the rights to Marvel games. Nintendo doesn't really need Mickey and co. ... they already have Mario and Pikachu and Donkey Kong and Kirby. But Marvel? Hell yeah, that could be a game changer for them.
|
Would be good for Nintendo, but still a terrible move for Disney.
Just by taking Marvel you rip into Disney Infinity, which is heavily geared to the Marvel Universe this time.
|
Well I assume Disney would still be allowed to do whatever they want with Disney Infinity.
Nintendo would just get ancilliary rights to make additional games based on those IP, which really Disney doesn't use. The Avengers really didn't get a major game release, nor has Iron Man, the Spider-Man games have been crappy for ages, and there wasn't a major game for X-Men in a long time either.
|
Where does Nintendo get the resources to make these games?
Do they begin shelving their own IP to give their resources to Disney IP?
I just don't see how this would be a good move for either side to be honest. |
both need something te other has, nintendo needs some fresh ips, why not make the next mario not mario but dolan duck? and disney needs more ip for the core disney brand, frozen was maybe a hit, but disney and pixar are putting out a lot of crap like planes and cars. they lost the magic..
