SanAndreasX said:
Tachikoma said:
McDonaldsGuy said:
Quake 3 on the Dreamcast did not sell 8 million or close to it, or revolutionize online gaming. By the way I used to own Quake 3 on the Dreamcast and liked it.
|
Kindly stop moving the goalposts, here is your statement.
I dont see a sales requirement here, just a false claim that you seem hell bent on defending to the death rather than simply doing the mature thing of saying "actually yeah, im wrong, my bad"
To be accurate, for the Atari, it was more Activision themselves that offered them with their range of games, this is a near complete range of them offered for people reaching certain achievements in their games.
Im my opinion, far cooler than a meaningless numerical gamerscore, though scores were also done, gaming magazines such as nintendo power would post highscores from games along with the name of the submitter in their monthly highscore columns, which would equate to the earliest version of a gamerscore.
|
I remember the Activision patches. Now those were cool rewards for real achievements. When I see a six-figure gamerscore, all I see is someone who Gameflys a bunch of crap games just to make his e-peen look bigger. I don't know anybody that actually looks through someone else's achievement lists.
|
I bet you if Sony thought of achievements first everyone would be all for them. Achievements are fun and addicting and a definite innovation.