bowserthedog said:
Nintendo gave the illusion they were trying to court them. Mostly they need some content year one while Nintendo played catch up on HD game development. When Nintendo matches the features of Playstation and Xbox and has the same power at the same time then you could say they truely courted the cross platfrom games. |
No. Nintendo expressed regret after the Wii era ended at the lack of highly praised and selling third party content on their platform. When this was revealed Activision was finally open to giving Nintendo a current gen port of Black Ops 2 because the console was finally on par, but one thing was missing which was community (sales) of the franchise on their platform. Reggie went on the news telling people that the Wii U was the best platform to play COD on, because they wanted the Wii U to be seen as no different than the Playstation in offerings but offering a twist with the way you play it. If marketers do not see a large enough installed base that could effectively pay for DLC they remove DLC from that platform. Generally its around 20% share of the installed base of the platforms base.
Watch their E3 conference in 2012. Nintendo courted numerous third party devs after going on a media crusade to prove they could stand with them. Something happened to cause them to have a falling out with EA and other publishers. What caused it? I don't know...but I bet a great portion of it has everything to do with the fact that Nintendo was too little too late and wanted third party to downport their next gen titles for them, which they had already said since 2011 was not going to happen unless console publishers met specifications. Microsoft and Sony were the only ones to listen.