Scientology on the news again, Anonymous owned them again

[Final-Fan]

starcraft said:

Final-Fan said:
Oh, and since you've baselessly suggested that Sqrl accused you of committing assault or murder, does that mean you'll stop cudgeling us all with ssj12's lapses of judgement? Or does this simply mean we get to cudgel you back?

WTF???? Where the hell did I suggest that?

And even if I had, why would I decide that what ssj12 said was ok?

After the murder comment he essentially said, "sorry I didn't mean to say that, maybe your only guilty of aggravated assault."

But apparently you consider that to be something of an apology.

"I'm not entirely sure what your doing? Are you agreeing with Ssj12 when he says that I am without doubt a murderer or at the very least a perpetrator of assault, simply because I don't believe Anonymous protestors should remain anonymous?"

If I ask you "Do you rape children?", there is a suggestion that you do, or do some related activity such as perhaps child porn, even if I haven't made a statement.  You say that Sqrl MIGHT agree with accusing you of murder and that a reasonable person could interpret his words that way.

ssj12:  "I used the "have done similar" part as a way to display that something along those lines could, be reasonable reason for why you arent displaying any sort of emotion to the C0$ crimes.  I'm not saying murder, morealong the lines of beating the crap out of someone or something that falls under voilent terms."

So he said 'Oops, what I meant was that being a person who is guilty of assault or some such thing would explain why you don't seem to be outraged at the CoS's actions.'  Basically reverting to the same suggestion of wrongdoing (but specifically excluding murder) that you are making, if less eloquently put.

I don't in fact think that's a full enough apology because as I said I am waiting for him to come back with the rest of it.  But apparently you ignored or misread that part.

I merely meant to say that since you now are guilty of the same sort of behavior as ssj12 (even if not quite as egregious), that you would refrain from continuing to hypocritically berate the kettle for being black -- being yourself a black pot.

[edit:  hmm, looks to me like you've basically accepted everything Sqrl said but said it doesn't apply to your arguments.  Well, let's see if that's true...]