Scientology on the news again, Anonymous owned them again

[Final-Fan]

starcraft said:

Phendrana said:
That's not my interpretation. That's not an accusation. It's just how they work. Like Christians going to church on Sunday, Scientology charges money, has a disconnection policy, forbids medication, and attacks critics. Jesus Christ, why is this so hard for you to understand?

Did you miss the part of my post where I said there are protesters who aren't anonymous, or are you just ignoring that so you can keep saying the same thing over and over again?

And it was a freaking joke, get over it.

But it is your interpretation.  Are you a former member?  Do you own their official policy guide?  Because unless the answer to at least one of those questions is a definitive yes, everything you have posted is your interpretation.

I didn't miss the part about non-anonymous protesters at all.  The reason I didn't comment is because I have already made reference to them numerous times in this thread.  I will repeat it once more for you.  I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEM WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE WILLING TO IDENTIFY THEMSELVES, LOOK THE CoS IN THE EYE AND MAKE AN ACCUSATION!!!!

Phendrana said:
http://lisatrust.freewinds.cx/scientology/snow-white/index.html
Here you go. A link about the FBI raids on the church, where they found documents on infiltrating government agencies as well as documents on framing people who opposed them.

http://www.clambake.org/archive/disk/fairgame.htm
And a link that has the text of the policy with the "tricked, sued, lied to or destroyed" quote.

You don't have to be a former member to know they do something like charge money or forbid medication. On that note, I'm done with this thread forever.

Unless I missed something starcraft you never responded to this.  I understand that this person left the thread but considering the relevancy and your continual requests for proof from other people I think it's important that you respond to this.  Otherwise you do nothing but strengthen Sqrl's (and my) suspicions.  

In particular, the clambake link contains the extremely important information that the "Fair Game" policy was repealed in name only and continues to this day (or at least 1989) so unchanged that many official documents still refer to it by the old, discontinued name!  I was aware that that was the case but I didn't realize it was proven by leaked documents.