generic-user-1 said:
fireburn95 said:
novasonic said:
Publishing an indie game is just giving them some money to keep it exclusive. Since they could have just as easily self-published without the stack of money, that shouldn't really count. Neither should Hyrule Warriors. Nintendoland, NES Remix, and Mario Maker are borderline.. There's also 3DS and Vita to consider.
In conclusion, they all seem to have a pretty equal ratio of new IPs to years in the 8th generation.
|
Isnt every third party deal 'giving them money'
This just shows which publishers are more willing to work with devs, first and third party, and 'indies' are included because indies are people too.
They are still games, good games, actually in all the cases in sony's list, sony owns the ip's (i think all the cases).
Hyrule warriors is debatable yeah.
Only focusing on the big three.
|
well this isnt realy fair, because nintendo is working in a differentway... they could have published shovel knights, but they just payed for timed exclusivity. |
And that's Nintendos onus.
Could've shouldve would've but didn't
