By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
chocoloco said:
mornelithe said:

Bronco's say strained, not torn.

Most articles say torn so of course he is writing that. Funny you are more interested in Peyton than the Patriots.

 

http://nypost.com/2015/01/12/hidden-injury-perfectly-explains-peyton-mannings-dud/

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/12/report-peyton-manning-has-a-torn-right-quadriceps/

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/1/12/7531725/peyton-manning-denver-broncos-injury-quad-thigh

Why wouldn't I be more interested in Peyton?  His future is currently uncertain and he's one of the best QB's to ever play the game?  If his issues late in the season were due to injury, then it could mean he could see the field again.  

http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_27304471/broncos-dispute-report-quarterback-peyton-manning-having-torn-right-quad

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2327121-peyton-manning-injury-updates-on-broncos-stars-quad-and-recovery

 

 

If it were a full torn quad, he would not have come back into the Chargers game, and probably been out the rest of the season.  Pats had a player go down with a torn Quad (I think it was Andre Carter) and he was lost for the season.