By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
The Fury said:
archer9234 said:

Honestly, if Carol was still Ms. Marvel. The movie would of probably been called that. They just didn't want to confuse people with the curent running series. And also boost her comic sales. The same worry would of happend with Mar-Vell, photon, or whoever else too. That's my reasoning why they did it this way. I also want She-Hulk used. But that's the issue with the Hulk movies being pushed aside. I know the only place they'll introduce her is with a Hulk movie. Because with Avengers. Having both is redundant. And probably a cost issue. Since Hulk had low screen time. Since he was CGI. She-Hulk is more money. Since she can stay in that state, every shot in the film would be an effect. Plus, I would like an actual correct origin story moment.

Your first point is valid. Yet, if you've been reading Avengers recently, it doesn't represent the films in anyway. Cannonball and Sunspot as members, hell even Superman was (:P) and it was set in space. (ignoring how bad it was).

Black Widow is not a Ironman character yet she was introduced and established in #2 before Avengers. So She-hulks introduction wouldn't be too hard and I don't think many would object to being introduced in the films. Or at least as Jennifer only. She-hulk does not have to be CG only, a tall powerful woman can fill the role but I get your point. Plus a definite on the last point.

As Jennifer, that be perfectly fine. I was pissed she wasn't used in passing in Fantastic Four, Iron Man, Incredible Hulk, or Daredevil. Ignoring the whole legal BS between Marvel/Disney and Fox. She could pop up pretty much anywhere as their lawyer, and it be fine. But that does mean they commit to who they cast as her human self, and voice.