The Fury said:
Okay, insulted is the wrong word maybe, sure. She is only just Captain Marvel, you know who Captain Marvel is to me? Mar-Vell, then Monica, then Genis-Vell. Carol is Ms. Marvel or Warbird. She-hulk, even better example of a strong powerful female Avenger, she is far more traditional Avenger than Hulk could even be as she has been one for far longer and proven her worth. Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver aren't X-men, they are mutants. It's the term mutant. Mutant is the Marvel Universe as far as I am concerned, it is what separates Marvel from all other comics, it's the fact there are just humans who have powers, it makes them easy to explain why they have the power and helped in establish numerous characters in the world that weren't just copies of already existing characters (aka DCs problem). ... so anyway, blah balh, I'm bitter. :P |
Honestly, if Carol was still Ms. Marvel. The movie would of probably been called that. They just didn't want to confuse people with the curent running series. And also boost her comic sales. The same worry would of happend with Mar-Vell, photon, or whoever else too. That's my reasoning why they did it this way. I also want She-Hulk used. But that's the issue with the Hulk movies being pushed aside. I know the only place they'll introduce her is with a Hulk movie. Because with Avengers. Having both is redundant. And probably a cost issue. Since Hulk had low screen time. Since he was CGI. She-Hulk is more money. Since she can stay in that state, every shot in the film would be an effect. Plus, I would like an actual correct origin story moment.
