Troll_Whisperer on 03 January 2015
Not a "let's shit on Nintendo" thread, bear with me.
I just thought about this. Nintendo are a publisher. Within it they have EAD 1, EAD 2, EAD Tokyo, Retro, etc.
Why is Nintendo considered a developer, while for Ubisoft it was just Ubisoft Montreal? I mean, Nintendo and Ubisoft are similar in that sense (let's forget the quality aspect of it...), many internally created developers under one name. If Retro makes a great game, "Nintendo" made it, but if Naughty Dog makes it it's not Sony? I don't get it.
I know I'm late to the party and that I'm trying to find logic in a video game award ceremony, but I found it curious.
No troll is too much for me to handle. I rehabilitate trolls, I train people. I am the Troll Whisperer.
