$130 will match or beat any console in terms of graphical fidelity.

[Final-Fan]

TheBigFatJ said:

Final-Fan said:
As long as it can run the OS and save games with no hard drive, with a 10% failure rate or less. Also it has to be guaranteed to play the latest games for at least 2 or 3 more years.

Oh and my cousin is a little stingy, is there a model that runs a different OS that isn't as powerful but has a sub-2% (or 1%) failure rate and is insanely popular, guaranteeing many good games for years to come? It doesn't have to play DVDs.

How about a > 30% failure rate?

If your cousin wasn't stingy, I'd recommend getting a Wii.  It's about the same price but it has tons of good games and is very popular.

How about not anymore? 

He's stingy in that he was holding out for a better VALUE, not necessarily better PRICE.  So, yes, well spotted. 

I see you can't do it.  (If you think it'll make a difference, I'll accept it if you can produce such a gaming PC with the higher failure rate.)  I expected as much, as it was a rhetorical question.  (Fine, technically a rhetorical request.)