| captain carot said: I'm disagreeing on Wii and Wiimote use. There was a minority of games even from Nintendo that really used the Wiimote well and to much games that would have played better with traditional controls or actually did play better on the classic controller. That said, there's a ton of games even on the e-shop. that make decent use of the touchscreen without overusing it. On other games i'm fine with off-tv and map. Bought AC IV for Wii U only because of off-tv. The slightly improved map was a nice to have, would've been better if you could have set targets directly on the touchscreen map. With Rayman Legends Murphy levels are actually fun. I'd love to see point & click adventures on Wii U by the way.
On the other hand, Mario Kart 8 without touchscreen features is better, but you still can use motion control.
And there's actual OS integrated features like Miiverse or simply the browser, the Gamepad is great for. Or switching on my TV. A small but acutually nice to have feature.
Kinect is pretty much useless aside from some Kinect games. It's even much more inefficient for OS features than pushing a button. I mean, Xbox On vs. pressing the guide button? Come on.
The Gamepads two biggest issues still are people thinking of it as a Wii add on instead of a new console with Gamepad and Nintendo doing extremely dumb marketing. |
Would love a Zack and Wiki 2.
