$130 will match or beat any console in terms of graphical fidelity.

[Final-Fan]

shio said:

Final-Fan said:

TheBigFatJ said:

Final-Fan said:
"can't compete with computers built at the same price point."

Show me the computer built at a $279 price point that plays CoD4, please.  The PS3 is only comparable to gaming PCs because of Blu-ray.

Sure, but I need to know what specifications you want first. Do you want a PC without a hard drive that will most likely die within a few months, and can only run COD4 at ~1024x600?

As long as it can run the OS and save games with no hard drive, with a 10% failure rate or less.  Also it has to be guaranteed to play the latest games for at least 2 or 3 more years.

Oh and my cousin is a little stingy, is there a model that runs a different OS that isn't as powerful but has a sub-2% (or 1%) failure rate and is insanely popular, guaranteeing many good games for years to come?  It doesn't have to play DVDs.

Hey can you point me to a console that has Crysis graphics, can let do my work on it, has backward compatibility for 20 years old games, the mostversatility, the best controls, has the best versions of games, the best online, the cheapest games, the most and best games, the....

Aside from the fact that your whole post is one big fat irrelevancy:
1.  No.
2.  Not gaming related.
3.  The PSP can run emulators too. 
4.  Define "versatility".
5.  That depends on the game you're playing.  I want to talk to someone playing SM64 on a PC who thinks it is way better without an analog stick. 
6.  Consoles are catching up fast.
7.  I could make an argument about DS games if I thought you wanted a serious conversation.
8.  "Most", maybe.  "Best", well, that depends ENTIRELY on what games you prefer.  If you like PC games better, well, obviously. 
9.  Consoles kick the PC's ass at "...."