Puppyroach said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Give it up....Killzone is not facing off against Halo. It was billed by the media as a Halo killer back in the PS2 era, but failed to live up to that. Since then its been doing its own thing. The saddest thing about Killzone is that everyone who criticized Killzone took it from its unique style with KZ2. They'eve actually tried to make the game play more like COD in the latest KZ so with that your comparison falls flat. Its obvious that right now they are trying to find their groove.
The reason why Sony is paying Activision for content is because they are playing the COD game Microsoft started with them. If you were Sony you would've done it as well seeing that its the same publisher. Microsoft still gets content first on the One and 360 with COD so its not like Sony shouldn't let up now we're all subjected to this on both sides of the tracks. If Microsoft wants to create false perception of exclusivity to something as minor as DLC so can Sony...so don't even go there. Its just the screwed up world of business that both Xbox and Playstation gamers have to live with now, isn't ?
|
I think Killzone´s biggest problem is that it lacks identity, and yes, it is still trying to go for the Halo audience.
I completely agree with you in the second part, both MS and Sony does this to make money and please gamers while doing it, they share those intentions :). And give it up with this whole "MS started it, and therefore forced Sony to do it!" Are you saying that Sony gets a free pass because MS alledgedly "started it"?
|
Killzone and Halo are nothing like. They're both futuristic first person shooters. The similarities pretty much end there.
