padib said:
That's true. In that case however, wouldn't it make sense for 3rd parties to find healthier ways to promote better return on investment? For example look at Street Fighter IV. Great game, sold lots. Did it require huge resources? Well it's no far cry that's for sure. It's no battlefield. 3rd parties are pushing cutting edge at their own peril. In order to compensate for their folly, they promote non-consumeristic parctices. If Nintendo can understand that when they don't need to (according to your post), why can't major 3rd parties? |
Nintendo can take a bigger risk, They don't have to pay the console manufacturer.








