padib said:
"While Nintendo steals the home console show by basically translating its portable victory across all its devices," That's my position on price. The first device of many will most likely be a handheld, because the 3DS is the first to need an upgrade. Thus as a handheld I expect it to follow the pricing model of the DS. Why? Because I don't expect it to contain any expensive hardware components (other than CPU and RAM) this time. It will only need to integrate every component in the WiiU (excluding CPU and RAM). The New3DS already laid the foundation for the dual analogue, as well as the NFC reader. They're basically at parity now when it comes to components other than CPU and RAM. Why would a handheld compete with the home consoles? Because it is a family of meshed devices, no longer standalone. Hence "gamechanger". There's nothing in OP that an interested or informed reader could miss. Don't tell me I say garbage. I try my best to write informed pieces that I've thought about thoroughly. Also I recommend reading the thread next time, as I've answered most of it already, specifically about the graphics arms race. |
Handheld market? Good luck with a new product when the majority of that market is now dead due to phones. This is why the vast majority of sales have been from Japan and no where else.
Because "meshed" devices helped with the psp...oh wait. It only works if people buy into it, and the ONLY company that has succeeded with this gimmick is Apple - one of the wealthiest companies in the world.
What you said was rubbish. I would love to see you pitch those opinions at a meeting and see the reactions. You never accurately addressed any point; market share, market growth, competition, cost of production, game library etc. Thos are actual points. Saying "I really like Nintendo and want a new console from them soon, and for it to do well" is not addressing anything besides telling people your preference.