Boutros said:
But most of the ones you have in mind (probably like Call of Duty or Assassin's Creed) don't come from a genre that's been around for over 30 years, that's been run into to the ground extensively and that requires limited technology. It feels like for a 2D platformer to stand out these days they need a unique artstyle because we all know they ultimately all play the same (or so). So if such a familiar genre recycles ideas then we know it probably didn't require much work, hence the lower price point. |
Kirby franchise has several traditional 2d platformers. This is a sequel of one game that plays completely different (compared to 2D platformers) and to top it off the 1st game probably came out about 10 years ago~ish.
"It feels like for a 2D platformer to stand out these days they need a unique artstyle because we all know they ultimately all play the same (or so)" How does this play the same (or so) as a 2D platformer btw? The artstyle is different, ok?
Srry im a bit confused as to wat your trying to get at here :-/
Edit: Just remembered where this started from (my first post). Does it bother you i think $40 is a good price for this game when many games recycle (when this game innovates alot more compared to many others) that are sequels? And like i previously mentioned, this is Nintendo's 2nd game that plays like this. and the first was so long ago :0
