By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 on 15 April 2008
Edit Thread
ssj12 said:
Kasz216 said:
ssj12 said:
Kasz216 said:
ssj12 said:

 

 




Sorry to say but most PC guys would agree Nini is not the best developer. There are indie devs that top Nini easily.

 


Based on what at least semi objective criteria?

The highest rated games are made by Nintendo... and computer games are counted in said ratings. They also make a wider variety of games ranked higher then someone like Valve.

Indy developers just haven't made enough games to be considered "Best" nor do they even have any games that top Mario Galaxy in critical acclaim.

Your just being blinded by the fact that you don't enjoy the Wii. If you look at it from any objective or semi objective criteria Nintendo wins.

You've yet to point out any criteria other then... "I disagree and some people i know disagree too."

If this was an arugement based on what people liked best i'd go with Atlus, Banpresto, Firaxis, or Will Wright.

Glad you brought him up. Spore will be the greats, even with EA's name on it... which is still ewww.

plus does it freaking matter because since everyone's taste in games are different, everyone's views will be different. Minus the overall fact that Bejeweled outsold every game on the planet. Peggle is better too...

have you ever been to an indie games convention or festival though? there is so many innovative games out there that are truly amazing. Why dont you actually go to one before you start questioning indie devs greatness. Its indie devs that brought flOw to the PS3, All the Go! games, and many others.


That's the difference. This isn't a case of pure opinion.

That would be "who is your favorite company".

Greatest needs something more then just personal opinion. It needs some sort of at least semi-objective criteria.

People need to look outside of their own narrowly defined boxes created by their own prefrences in gaming and look at the criteria objectivly.

If you can't bring any objective critieria you may as well be argueing that Phil Mickleson is better then Tiger Woods.