Pokemon As An Annual Franchise?

[naruball]

BraLoD said:

So when AC does it it's milking and ridiculous, but if it's Pokémon it's great and all ok? Lol.
And Pokémon actually comes in two games every new gen... so annual and actually twice a year most of the times and that's ok?

Really, I think it's okay for ANY game to be annual IF they can do a good game every year.
Assassin's Creed was having great games every year and was so massacred because of it, so who thinks it's okay with Pokémon, it's just like this with any other game that someone likes, so no more massacres, ok?

Really hard to try to back it up with the disaster Unity was, but it's the same principle.
When someone likes a game/franchise it's okay for him to want it every year, just like some of you are doing right now

I've noticed that too, but I think there are exceptions. I absolutely love naruto games and I don't plan on skipping any of them on any platform. But my bias doesn't make me blinded to how Cyberconnect2 is milking the franchise. There should be a new game every other year at best. And I find the whole argument of "well, if the quality is there, it's fine, but COD is being milked to death because I don't like it" laughable. 

As for Pokemon. I bought X last year and don't plan on buying another one for another decade unless they finally decide to make some drastic changes. Due to its loyal fanbase, the franchise has been selling extremely well and thus hasn't evolved much at all; I find it an absolute shame.