How's Killzone SF compared to the old ones?

[S.T.A.G.E.]

Munkeh111 said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

PullusPardus said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

KZ SF has the best multiplayer in the history of the franchise, but the single player goes to KZ2. Sony has a growing FPS and TPS community and a lot of them are very...very good. 

TPS? Which games? I would love to see SOCOM on PS4 (Or...syphon filter? I wish they revived that)

Sony has found their niche making TPS games. They are really good at it...which is why they put so much faith in the Order. Uncharted and Last of Us are their main TPS games. Uncharted 4 is going to be so epic. I cannot wait to see how large the maps are in that game because Uncharted 3 and 2 was just so eventful. Its not like Gears at all. Tomb Raider tried to rip it off but failed big time.

If by Sony, you mean Naughty Dog, then probably yes. They can back the Order because Ready at Dawn have great games before, they were also set up by ex-Naughty Dog developers...

I think it's pretty good. I think the key difference is that it's a bit more fast paced than it's predecessors, certainly more so than 2, even if it's not like old CoD let alone Advanced Warefare and Titanfall. The game experiements with open levels early on, but cuts back on it as the story progresses (it's not a terrible story)

MP I found reasonably fun, but I'm not a huge fan of online multiplayer in general

I know what I mean when I said Sony. Naughty Dog is a representative of Sony and they would not have delved into third person shooters if it wasnt for Sony. Much like the owners of Rare left when they sold it to MS so to did the owners of Naughty Dog. Those companies will never leave either unless the company sells it off before going under. Whoever runs the the company better is your decision from there.

I agree with your assessment of KZ:SF...you'll find no argument from me there.