theprof00 said:
ie: if the metacritic of a 360 game was 80, i believe they would give a 86-91. The calculations showed consistent 5-10 point above average scores. I guess until I find the thead though, this is all heresay, but it was done using calculations from the top 50 games and review score vs meta. Basically a trend of rating 360 games 30 points higher. However, games that tended to be reviewed by mainland europe would rate the ps games better, while uk would rate badly. |
Kudos to that person for having the patience in doing that for us lol. Don't forget the ps3 game especially multiplats , was worse technically then xbx 360 counterparts. As a result, it would get a lower score. Didn't ps3 also have more games overall? I do remember alot o the ones were pretty bad and mediocre and as a result got a lowere score. That could explain the difference. I do remember eurogamer giving all the unchartered games high scores. they loved he gamePeople thinking its a conspiracy against sony are truly nuts. it just happens that the person reviewing wasn't imporessed about the game. hes not paid to give a scorethat fans of the platform right?