Soundwave said:
We're supposed to be outraged at MS for Tomb Raider exclusivity but SFV exclusivity is iron-clad and can't possibly be broken and even on top of that its been suggested its a good thing. Then cue all the crying about Monster Hunter only on 3DS. Most entitled fanbase on the internet. |
There are several differences that I'm sure you have ignored but I will now explain to you.
1. Sony clarified the nature of exclusivity at the very beginning. They said point blank, PS4 is the only console you will ever get to play Street Fight V on. On the other hand Microsoft and Square dance around the question for weeks before finally explaining that yes the deal has some sort of duration. We still of course don't know the specifics. Good PR goes a LONG way in this business, one of the many reasons PS4 is currently winning in sales.
2. We have direct and irrefutable proof that Capcom WOULD NOT FUND STREET FIGHTER V. They didn't give Ono the money to make the game. They wouldn't even give him money to put Ultra SFIV on next gen consoles. He had reuse a ton of assests just to make USFIV on last gen consoles clearly showing Capcom doesn't invest a lot of money in the franchise. So Sony stepped in and helped out with funding for a game THAT WAS NOT GOING TO GET MADE WITHOUT EXTRA FUNDING. When ROTR was announced there was never any hint about exclusivity. It was pretty clear the game was angling for a multiplat release. One of the Square Enix insiders on Gaf confirmed the game was originally multiplat but I understand not wanting to trust insiders.
I like you Soundwave, but your annoying vendetta against Sony fans is just grating on the nerves especially when it doesn't make much sense.
Sigs are dumb. And so are you!
