By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
st0pnsw0p said:
Twilord said:


Words struggle to explain why Zelda is visually superior despite not having the same graphical intensity. So I'll explain it simply with this:

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/95qc2yd22w8jsj9/Arting%20Correctly.png?dl=0

So what you're saying is, the more colorful/less realistic something is, the more artistic it is? I guess someone needs to go back in time and tell Leonardo Davinci that the Mona Lisa has a worse artstyle than Phineas and Ferb.

You summarized my discussion with Padib in a different way... but you won't win on it... impossible to make them accept that they just see something Nintendo and justify that cartoony is more artistic and that defines the argument.


There is nothing artistic in copying reality, taking a picture of reality does not require art skills, inventing a imaginary world does!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n29CicBxZuw

01001011 01101001 01110011 01110011 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110011 01110011 00100001