By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 said:
TheBlackNaruto said:

Question how did the Forensic eveidence support Wilson side of the story? It just showed that Brown was not shot in the back. Doesnt prove if he charged him or not. How were the people who said he had his hands up caught lying about it? Weren't there still different sides of the story? Why is one witness more credible than the others if the stories are not consistent? The reason there was no indictment WAS NOT because the evidence supported Wilsons side of the story there was no indictement because there was too much room for reasonable doubt and nothing concrete outside of the altercation that happened inside the car. Everything else is a toss up so with nothing solid there can be no indictment. 

Well, for one thing, the angle of the gunshot wounds showed that brown had his hands forward like he was charging and not up in the air as some witnesses were saying.The forensic evidence supports wilson's and some witnesses' side of the story. You'll have to look up about the different forensic evidence and how it showed what probably happened for yourself. The others got caught lying.  Once a witness is caught lying, it discredits them as a credible witness for the most part. 

Well that's the thing I have already looked up all the information that has been given. And what you are saying could go both ways the forensic evidence shows that he could have been charging, he could have had his hands up or that he could have even been falling forward. It doesn't just support what you are saying. Again hence the reason there was no indictment because there was not sufficent evidence to say for sure if it was one way or the other. And again with so many of the witnesses' having different stories and opinions what makes one more credible than the other? Leaving out the ones that were "caught lying" there are still far too many conflicting stories. And there were onl 2 people who ACTUALLY know what happened we have one side of the story from one of the two but the other side will never be known because the other party is no longer with us.



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23