| Aeolus451 said: Well, for one thing, the angle of the gunshot wounds showed that brown had his hands forward like he was charging and not up in the air as some witnesses were saying.The forensic evidence supports wilson's and some witnesses' side of the story. You'll have to look up about the different forensic evidence and how it showed what probably happened for yourself. The others got caught lying. Once a witness is caught lying, it discredits them as a credible witness for the most part. |
What I find interesting is how you jump to the conclusions you have on less then 3rd hand report. One witness who was close to the action actually stated that it was Wilson who grabbed Mike Brown and was the aggressor. He stated Mike attempted to get away and it was Wilson who prevented him from leaving and shot Mike Brown as he tried to remove himself from the car.
The difference between this witness testimony and Wilson is that one or the other could be correct. You only have Wilson testimony that Mike Brown was the agressor and reached for his gun. Lets just think this through a bit. If you want to justify shooting an unarmed man, stating that the person attempted to grab your gun wold be a pretty good excuse. In the end, we as the people will never hear or see all of the evidence for the case. Without hearing all of the witnesses, testimony and evidence, people are left fustrated and made because we cannot get to what really happen that day. Either way what you consider is a lock really isnt. Its just another side of the story that can be spinned in any direction and only Mike Brown and Wilson know the total truth.
