By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Areym said:
Samus Aran said:
Areym said:
toot1231 said:
FATALITY said:
toot1231 said:
Not bad at all. Higher scores than Destiny lol


diferent games dude. 

 and point is? Either way still a higher score.

Destiny has tons of more room for error. It tried to achieve many things and sadly, failed on some. This toad game is just a mario-spin off puzzler, Nintendo played it safe.

And Destiny had a €500 million budget... Captain Toad isn't even close to 5% of that budget.

I don't see how that has relevance in this but ok. Destiny is on a much, much grander scale than Captain Toad. Granted, bigger isn't always better, you are right if that's what you implied.. Still, Captain Toad was a safe game for Nintendo, piggy backing on the Mario universe. If it had been a completely new character and universe, I don't think it would garner much buzz. Destiny is the start of a new mega-franchise (wheter it will stick has yet to be seen) and really prone to failure, Captain Toad is just another game for the Wii U.

a faceless massively multiplayer shooter blatantly ripping off halo's gunplay and character design (not that those are especially good) is not a risk. it is as safe as you can get. almost as safe as a gta clone with hacking (watch dogs). almost, but destiny takes the cake.