Why are there so many XBox 360 haters on gaming forums?

[Strategyking92]

ZenfoldorVGI said:

Strategyking92 said:

 

I never said they milked one franchise. I listed a bunch of their big franchises.

The only franchise that keeps things fresh (with any story in it) is advance wars, I didn't want to include a masterpiece in the rubbish I mentioned.

What about Fire Emblem? Doesn't it have a story? In fact, isn't it made by the same people who make Advance Wars?

Non-violent? or just to lazy to make beautiful games?

One would assume you are saying games require violence to be beautiful, but that's not your intent. I admit your intent was hard to decifer here. Did you mean non-violent games are caused by laziness? Is Manhunt 2 not lazy, then? Are violent games always beautiful? Are beautiful games always violent? I give up, I can't decipher your meaning. It's poorly written and nonsensical.

colorful graphics? or just lazy?

Lazy? What are you talking about? It's become crystal clear to me that you've played very few, to no Wii games in your life, which is unfortunate. You speak of development or hardware? Graphical development is limited by the hardware? Are you telling me that Nintendo worked in conjunction with Retro studios to make a machine that wasn't graphically intensive because Retro is lazy and didn't feel like it. How bout this? Are you telling me that laziness, and not hardware limitations cause graphics to be lesser than the Xbox 360, and indeed the Wii is capable of much more. You make no sense, sir.

no story? or didn't hire any story writers?

Are you familiar with the concept of different software studios? How bout this? Nintendo hired the writer of Final Fantasy VII for the small story in SSB:B. It's more about a gameplay for certain games than money to hire writers. 

Almost no differences in the franchise for 20 years? or just milking?

Metroid? Pikmin? Zelda? Wii Sports? You played Zelda on Nintendo? Mario? 20 years? Seriously? Do you really believe that Super Mario Galaxy, Twilight Princess, MP3, or Brawl were lazily developed to milk a franchise? Are you actually saying that, having played them all, that these games are lazy cashins? Jesus H. Christ. You sir, lose credibility with every word.

EDIT: I guess nintendo games can be good for small children, who really don't care about a good story, or complex gameplay and open world gameplay.

 

Nintendo games can be for...small children, and small children alone. No grown man would want to play a videogame about Mario or Zelda? You know, it's people like you who say that about the videogame industry as a whole. You know what, they never played a videogame, just like you've rarely played a Wii. Your sincere lack of respect, understanding, or acceptance of anyone with different tastes than you make me sick, sir.

Wow. You're not a gamer, my friend. You're just a wandering soul, lost in a world that's bigger than you could imagine. You'll find literally hundreds of posters on this forum that could say what you just, with much better form. They would do it so well, that it would piss your target off far more than you did, and it wouldn't even have been considered trolling.

 

However, you are not them. You sir, give Nintendo-Haters a bad name, and that I don't say lightly. I've responded in red, so that we may leave no doubt.

okay, you are using FOX news tactics. Okay I can roll.

1.Fire emblem isn't a major franchise (what? 2-3 game boy games and 1 console game?) So I never mentioned it with the milked games

 

2.I have owned a wii game since launch, I used violence as an example, because it is detailed, you don't usually see a really detailed mario jump attack.  (i guess you could also blame this on the wii's inadequacy in graphics (I think i spelled that wrong))

 

3. Mario kart.  How could you say that looks good?  It's colorful, to hide it's ugliness. *looks for pattern in all mario games*

 

4.Really? Maybe that's why people say the  subspace emissary mode sucks.

 

5.Yes I do believe so. An example: well... all of those franchises I mentioned (pokemon is too obvious, all that's different is the new pokemon, that get more ridiculous each installment)  I can only own so many games in each franchise, and play so many.  And, yes, I think they are lazily developed, or more likely, made "safe" taking no risks and making the franchise the same each time a game is released. (EX: Madden)(I have a clear point, but You gotta think about it)

 

6.And finally the last part:

 

Again, I DO OWN A WII, and I have probably owned mine longer than you.

#2 I never said it wouldn't be fun for old people, the wii ads make sure that message gets across

 (accidently left out)

Nintendo games are fun.. for the first 30 minutes. Then anyone who likes more than  Ooooooh HOOOOO itsa mario! will be watching TV. My point is, they're not deep, and it takes more to hold an adults attention. 

#3Oh and You insult me? Eyerytime you post on an xbox, or ps forum  you become the  Dr Jekyll  of VGChartz