By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
oniyide said:
generic-user-1 said:
oniyide said:
awesomeabe1998 said:
generic-user-1 said:
awesomeabe1998 said:

Why would you buy an underpowered console with less games when you can get a powerful console with all the multiplayer plus some exclusives and better online for $200 extra?


because nintendo games have the highest quality and are realy fun?


I agree with you on that one but the average consumer does not know that.

no the average consumer doenst BELIEVE that. Big difference. Nintendo has the highest quality isnt truth its a opinion no amount of posting is going to make it true. The numbers prove that.

did u ever played a broken 1st party nintendo game full of bugs?  the best quality doesnt mean you have to love em, its like a toyota or a vw, best quality , but u dont have to love their cars


metroid other m had a bug and Mario Kart 7 had a bug in one of the levels. Clearly people dont care that much about bugs otherwise things like Skyrim wouldnt put up the numbers they do. Now if that bothers you and if that is lacking "quality" then that is your opinion and right to feel that way, keyword: YOUR. Most dont share that opinion. If a person doesnt like those games in the first place it doesnt matter how little bugs it has, dont know why people here dont get that.

it doesnt matter if i like the games or not if i judge the quality of games.

 

i like a lot of realy broken games, but i understand that the quality of those games is bad.  nd i like realy realy bad movies, and understand that the quality is shit, but i like em. (i have all uwe boll movies).

 

and sure, nintendo games have bugs, every game has bugs, but in a high quality game, u can play 100+h without finding one.