mornelithe said:
You're assuming every criminal thinks logically/coherently. If that were the case, Brown would've worn a mask, scoped the store for cameras etc (or, you know, found the money to purchase the things he wanted)... Mr Brown seems like your typical dumbass teenager who made a stupid mistake (My brother made a similar error in his childhood, he didn't assault a cop, but he did do some petty B&E, and he did time for it), and then exacerbated that mistake by not obeying the officer in whatever capacity. I 100% agree Cops should be wearing body cameras at this point, with several severe penalties attached for continuing a shift w/ a non-functioning cameras. Checks for function prior to going on duty (there should also be an audible noise from the camera when it stops recording or something like that, maybe even a signal sent to HQ, to notify another individual of a non-functioning unit), and checks when they go off-duty. With weekly film breakdowns of the feeds (sorta like sports film breakdown, what you did wrong, what you did right etc...). And it should be used as a learning tool, as well as evidence whenever things like this occur. Wilson may very well have killed Brown in cold blood, he may very well have used excessive force in a situation where it didn't warrant it. But, I don't think the evidence was there to indict, especially given conflicting witness accounts, and changing witness stories as the physical evidence was analyzed. I don't like seeing a murderer get away with something, but I like even less to see people arrested/convicted on bad evidence, or even worse, in the court of public opinion (How many minorities have suffered/died in prison for decades, because of bad evidence, for example). The public is generally dumber than a box of smashed assholes. Like we want those morons meteing out justice. |
I can pretty much say this is oneof the best posts in this thread. Very well put!
The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...
PSN: StlUzumaki23







