phaedruss said:
Cream147 said:
And here's the thing for Ubisoft - you can get away with diabolical games on other platforms. Look at how much Assassin's Creed: Rogue has sold, despite all the bad press it has got. But Nintendo fans in general, simply aren't going to take it. We notice when you spit in our face. On Wii U, you're competing with the best developer, and to compete with the best, you've got to be the best. Ubisoft, EA, Activision, these companies simply don't know how to produce real quality.
Why would anyone buy a game that's 6 month delayed, has last gen graphics, terrible framerate, little use of unique hardware features, and by most accounts wasn't a very good game to begin with. Thanks Ubisoft, but I think I'll just go with Smash. |
What a load of BS wii u owners won't buy it in general simply because it's not a Nintendo game. You think that the average wii u owner reads digital foundry?
|
Not specifically Digital Foundry no, but do I think in general Wii U owners do better research about games before they buy them - absolutely.
Of course Wii U owners have a bias towards Nintendo games. You don't buy a Nintendo console to play third party, do you. Nevertheless, I'm convinced that if a third party took the effort to put out a decent game on the console it would sell - not as much as Nintendo games, but 10-100 times better than what Watch Dogs Wii U will sell. I would certainly buy such a game.
