Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
Samus Aran said:
MikeRox said:
outlawauron said:
Samus Aran said:
Hilarious how you try to blame this on Nintendo. You do know that every 3D Sonic game has sucked major ass right? Sonic Colors is mostly 2D and Sonic Generations is barely 4 hours long. Sega is the only one to blame for these 3 shitty games.
|
Wat. Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 were fantastic.
|
It's Samus again with his facts he is unable to back up.
As well as SA1 being amazing (for 1998) and SA2 being decent. Sonic Colours, Sonic Generations and Sonic Lost World are also decent polygon based Sonic titles.
Colours mostly 2D? Again a non-fact invented to support a poor at best argument.
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z13eY1NdP6g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbfXqOMf0Ak
If you honestly think these games are good then you are blinded by a fuck ton of nostalgia. Horrible story, horrible graphics (even for its time), horrible voice acting, glitches, bugs, horrible gimmicks, horrible gameplay ideas (Big the Cat, seriously?), horrible animations, etc. If these games were released today they would get slaughtered by critics. In fact, if they remade these games with better graphics and change nothing else I'm convinced it wouldn't score higher than 75%. These games are nowhere near Ocarina of Time, Super Mario 64 or Metroid Prime. Those are good examples of games making the transition from 2D to 3D flawlessly.
And are you denying that Sonic Colors is mostly a 2D game? Lmao, no point in argueing with you. The 3D stages of Sonic Colors were probably the worst part of the game.
|
The same critics who give pokemon a 7.8 because of too much water?
|
I think you've said all that needs to be said.
Samus, horrible graphics for it's time? Are you sure you didn't play the Broken Gamecube ports?
