By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 20 November 2014
Edit Thread
Seece said:
DonFerrari said:
Seece said:

PS2 is 62m clearly, I was never disputing that any of the figures are fake, just that his assumptions are wrong (IMO).

he gave PS2 at 162M as possible, just taught it was a little lower than that but PS3 a little more... but I don't think we will quite get a formal release for PS3 now that they are giving more numbers for PS4.

His PS3 estimate is clearly wrong tho, I just gave a bunch of logic as to why.

And we will, the day Sony are sure of it, they'll say something. They have no reason not to.

(Just like how we got X360 > Wii in the UK) and will get the same for the US this holiday.


I didn't check the calculus he put but well it won't make much of a difference in the end. Just going by the recent shipment numbers we know Sony have outshipping MS for quite some time. 

Perhaps we get an announcement during the anniversary.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."