starcraft said:
I am glad we agree. I do not think people should refrain from saying there are discrepencies in the numbers if thats what they feel. But there are right and wrong ways to go about that (additionally, its starting to become all some users talk about - which is frankly just boring). I have not seen the tweet, which would be nice for clearing things up? But certainly I saw a number of Western news sources, and they did not appear to pick up on any translation of sold through, and some that were based on a GAF poster with a flawed history. Which does not mean the number was shipped or sold, it just means there is plenty of ambiguity, making attacks on ioi all the less valid. |
I don't think any reason is valid to attack ioi even if we disagree about his numbers or comments. Talking about it for so long can be boring, but it is all in the same timeframe the Germany, UK, shipments they are all to close and the only reaction was further down adjustments and I bet that got a lot of people quite unpleased.
In this same thread a few posts before this there is the clarification on twitter... on the germany news some users translated the part about the selling, but it is acceptable to not completely believe them before we get official info.
EDIT: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6852609

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







