By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nadwki said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:


Sony was chipping away at Microsofts previous years even from its launch at $600 dollars. The best way to make bigger profits is to outsell your LY. If your opponent is outselling your LY after being behind they are sure to catch up. MS is also lucky Sony turned down the Kinect because that saved them from Sony overtaking them in 2010.

Yeah even with all the issues, as you say with the PS3 it was increasing sales year on year over the 360's previous year it was constantly chipping away at the 360's lead, it was slow but inevitable I guess. Will be interesting to see where this gen ends up regarding sales.

As for kinect, amazing to think Sony could have taken it up, their loss was MS's gain for while, I think it helped re image the 360 in a way at the time, now kinect has had an adverse effect for MS. Thinking that maybe in hindsight it was fortunate that Sony didn't take it up?


Well the Kinect issue was because Sony was self sufficient and the guys at Project Natal weren't showing them anything they weren't already capable of doing themselves. The Eyetoy had already been doing what the Kinect had been doing years earlier, so Sony turned it down. They knew they had to create an add-on for the Kinect to help control the 3D environment while traversing through it without being on rails. Sony considered their first Eyetoy to be a glorified mini-game camera, which is essentially how they percieved the Kinect desipite its success.