Teeqoz said:
irstupid said:
| Teeqoz said:
"The mechanic is just not to the reviewers liking"
No, ofcourse it isn't. I'll ask you again, have you read the link I gave you? It's literally impossible to make a review without OPINIONS and OPINIONS are PERSONAL and based on PREFERENCES and wether you like it or not BIASES. Let's for example take Mario Galaxy. I could say that all those reviewers giving it a 100 score are biased and shouldn't be reviewing the game, because the obviously are bieased towards liking the game mechanics.
But since you basically refute logic, there is no reason for me to continue this discussion, because the very idea of an unbiased review is impossible.
|
No I didn't read the link. I don't go to links. Links go to sites that are most likely of some shit that just wants views. I stick to mainly forums so that these shit ass sites don't get revenue from me.
I know what freaking opinions and preferences are. Everyone has them and there is no way of keeping htem out of a review. But just like any statistics one does you need to remove the outliers, because they are not a good representation of the data. Something that since Metacritic doesn't do, makes it a complete joke to me.
To me this guy/girl reviewing this game sounds like an outlier. Not because of the score. Nothing wrong with 7.8, but because of the views expressed. It seems this person despises the water aspect of Pokemon, from traveling to the pokemon. Hardly someone that should be reveiwing a game that has it as its main theme. Same as I said before with the court case. you should not put a racist person on the jury for the whatever the case is going on with the cop and the black kid that cuased the riots. It's clearly gonna be a completely biased point of view.
And as I said before, it goes both ways. A die hard pokefanatic should not review this game either. You should not have Misty review this game.
|
So now you're changing your mind? Reviews can be biased after all? This person hardly despises the water aspects of pokemon, she just doesn't like them and don't think they're well executed. Despise is a very stong word. This score is 6 points below the average score. That's hardly an outlier. It just means she didn't like it quite as much as the average reviewer did.
Also, how can you say that this person despises the water aspect of pokemon when you haven't even read the review?
|
I never changed my mind.
And I said the score wasn't an outlier, i said the opinion/preference was. Like a jury. Talking about racism, it goes both way. In the Ferguson trial, there are plenty of people who are 100% convinced before hand that the cop is guilty because they are racist, and there are plenty of people that are 100% positive that he is innocent because they are racist. Both of those groups of people should be miles away from the jury panal for that court case.
From the quotes I have seen of this review, it seem seems this reveiwer doesn't like the water aspect of Pokemon games and thus should not be reviewing a pokemon game that revolves around water as its core theme. They need to find someone impartial to water in Pokemon. This impartial person may end up hating it by the end of the game, but they shouldn't before even picking up the game.
I dislike the water surfing in pokemon games as I said before, and thus if i were a reviewer i would excuse myself from reviewing this game. I know before even playing this game that I would not really enjoy the game and thus would have a biased score.
