| luinil said: I simply refuse. All I was attempting to do with this thread to get people thinking about solutions. Obviously this won't go anywhere in this community. BTW that one man was the leader of that country. He had NUMEROUS UN resolutions stating that he should disarm and allow UN Weapons inspectors free access to all resources. He never did that. Are we going to simply let one man oppose the entire world community? We know that Saddam had chemical weapons (a type of WMD) because he used them against the Kurds. He probably didn't have stockpiles, like the CIA said he did. There are apparently new reports stating that if he gave the order, he was 4-5 weeks away from stockpiling chemical and biological weapons. No links, just reports. Sorry. So now that we have established we won't agree on why we are there, what do we do now? Agree to disagree and part ways? Or look for solutions to our pickle of a situation? |
Insted of understanding the error of your ways you want to agree to disagree??
Going by your logic then the US ows a lot of money to the terrorist for destroying the World Trade Center so if Iraq should pay you for your services over there then you should pay the terrorists for their services at your end.
Vaio - "Bury me at Milanello" R.I.P AC Milan
In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it normal.
If laughing is the best medicine and marijuana makes you laugh
Is marijuana the best medicine?
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
“If any creator has not played Mario, then they’re probably not a good creator. That’s something I can say with 100 percent confidence. Mario is, for game creators, the development bible.
