I simply refuse. All I was attempting to do with this thread to get people thinking about solutions. Obviously this won't go anywhere in this community. BTW that one man was the leader of that country. He had NUMEROUS UN resolutions stating that he should disarm and allow UN Weapons inspectors free access to all resources. He never did that. Are we going to simply let one man oppose the entire world community?
We know that Saddam had chemical weapons (a type of WMD) because he used them against the Kurds. He probably didn't have stockpiles, like the CIA said he did. There are apparently new reports stating that if he gave the order, he was 4-5 weeks away from stockpiling chemical and biological weapons. No links, just reports. Sorry.
So now that we have established we won't agree on why we are there, what do we do now? Agree to disagree and part ways? Or look for solutions to our pickle of a situation?
