GTAexpert said:
I have more reasons than that to call them biased: 1. They gave SM3DW GOTY of 2013 when the rest of the world was giving it to either TLOU or GTA V. 2. They also gave it a 10, way above its metacritic average. 3. They gave MK8 a 10, again way above its metacritic average. 4. They gave Infamous: Second Son and Driveclub a 7 and 6, way below their metacritic averages. They even criticised Driveclub for not being open-world and not having a festival like FH2 did. 5. They declare this as the best-looking game of this year. 6. Their recent article of PS4's first year, and not even mentioning its highlights like Infamous: Second Son. |
1. They ain't the only ones giving GOTY to SM3DW, look it up. Even if they were, you know this award is very subjective don't you? Maybe, just maybe, some gaming journalists are just tired of all lifelike wanna bes? Anyway, you sayi this site is biased towards Nintendo because of they gave GOTY to SM3DW when it's actually the only nintendo game winning GOTY over the last 15 years? ok...
2. It's meta is 93, 0,7 up;
3. MK8 has 88 meta, 1.2 above. Also, there are other perfect 10s fot MK8, are those biased towards Nintendo too?
4. Second Son has a Meta of 8, they gave it a 7, jus 1.0 below. Actually the score being given more times is 8, the second one is 7 (I:SS was 14 or 15 times rated 7 by gaming sites). DC has 71 meta, they gave it 6 as you claim, just 1.1 below.
5. It certainly is amongst the better looking of the year. And the fact that it runs at smooth 60 fps (which I'm sure almost (if any) none of those you claim to be better looking can do) is very impressive. In order to run at 60FPS you may have to sacrifice graphical fidelity, but on the other hand it's also more pleasing to the eye as well as its way better gameplaywise.
6. Didn't read that.
Seriously, I don't even know how you can say a gaming site which name starts with "Euro" is biased towards Nintendo...
