I think Angry Joe has to stop reviewing multiplayer console shooters.

[S.T.A.G.E.]

OttoniBastos said:

CavemanCavan said:
He's the only reviewer on the planet that realizes average isn't 7.5. That makes him the man with one eye on a planet of the blind as far as I'm concerned.

This^ 

 

People need to understand that Angry joe's 6 isn't the same as IGN's.

 

Big site reviewers have short number range when it comes to reviews

basically:

9+: must have

8+:average

7+:stable shit

6+:Shit with bugs or anti-consumer's features but you can play it

5+:Shit with bugs AND anti-consumer's features but you can play it

4+: Shit so broken you can't play it

3+: It causes damage to you machine

2+: don't even boot

1+: it's basically printf("hello world");

 

in other words,when a IGN gives a 7 for a game,the game is shit or they are against the game for some reason...

 

Angry joe knows how a score range should be but people are so used to the doritocracy model that they think AJ is wrong....

I agree with you, but that isn't my issue. Did you watch the review? He knows people aren't fans of how he reviews multiplayer shooters in general. He even admitted that he didnt play much of the multiplayer to begin with. His only proper review portion was for the single player. That was top notch as usual.