By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
kupomogli said:
kowenicki said:


I know, I was looking at the Vita port debacle.

But that getting 91 is even more reason why this is harsh imo... as illustrated by someone else earlier.

The Vita version received a 73, deservedly so with all the framerate issues.  The PS3 version received a 91.

I know... I quoted it by mistake.  I didnt intend to use it as evidence.

But as I said, the 91 for the ps3 version strehgthens many peoples arguments here.

Not quite, since most of the Halo games are much older than GoW was back then. 

I mean GoW I and II reviewed in the 93-94 range but the collection got a meta that was lower than the "sum of its parts" by 2-3 points.  The games were quite recent at the time.



The One and Only

VizionEck.com