kowenicki said:
I know... I quoted it by mistake. I didnt intend to use it as evidence. But as I said, the 91 for the ps3 version strehgthens many peoples arguments here. |
Not quite, since most of the Halo games are much older than GoW was back then.
I mean GoW I and II reviewed in the 93-94 range but the collection got a meta that was lower than the "sum of its parts" by 2-3 points. The games were quite recent at the time.








