mysteryman on 04 November 2014
| bugrimmar said: Anyway, the point of what I was saying is that "assuming a human population continues to exist", meaning some humans won't get turned/infected. In the scenario of humans vs. zombies in a real war, removing the possiblity of "everyone getting infected", the humans can't lose because of weapons technology. |
If you assume that all humans can't get infected then it's pretty unbalanced.
It's like saying that zombies are the clear winners, as long as we assume that they are never fully eradicated.
