Can anyone say to me why nintendo shos us a grpahic and than they use another in ZELDA U??

[Skidmore]

curl-6 said:

mZuzek said:

curl-6 said:

Twilight Princess was essentially an apology for Wind Waker, after the latter delivered something nobody ever asked for.

And it was still miles better than Twilight Princess ever hoped of being.

To be honest I'm really glad they didn't go for the realistic artstyle this time and in my opinion Zelda Wii U is easily the prettiest game I've seen so far. Yes, I'm talking every game ever there. Is it technically impressive? I don't know and couldn't care less, but it does look very beautiful. Also, in response to the OP, they never changed the graphics - it was always a tech demo and they even said several times that the real game could look nothing like that.

I'm just grateful we're not getting Ocarina of Time 3 (or Twilight Princess 2, whatever you might wanna name it) and instead they're making another unique, special Zelda like Majora's Mask, The Wind Waker and Skyward Sword were. It's especially refreshing when you consider that the latest game in the franchise has no personality either.

I wasn't talking about personal preference, I was talking about commercial appeal in the current market. 

We are the current market, the loyalists, the number of sales would probably not double because of the art style, this will just miss a little bit of actual buyers. Anyone who ever considered buying a Wii U because of a Zelda, would still buy even with this art style.