By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Gaming - CONSOLEs vs PC - View Post

TheJimbo1234 on 03 November 2014
Edit Thread
Intrinsic said:
TheJimbo1234 said:

Your first sentence doesn't even make sense. The grammar in it is dire.

Ironic you say I won't listen, yet most PC gamers here including myself are accusing you of exactly that - not listening. You belittle people and won't look at anyones argument besides yourself, even when it is spelt out to you. And yes, you don't know anything about this topic, hence why you have no idea about benchmarks etc and post very confusing and mixed posts.

I think what demostrates this best is when I made my clear reply to you and you just ignored the points and went into denial, begging the timeless question of; what would it take for you to change your mind? Obviously simply logic and maths won't suffice.

Show me how I have tried to belittle anyone? Cause you can say stuff doesn't mean what you are saying is true. And the rest of this bolded part? well its exactly why I am refraining from getting into an meaningful discussion with you. But if thee is one ting I am happy about though, is that you at least now mention "benchmarks". Guess we are getting closer to home. You know you ae completely off the mark when you have to resort to the tone you are using and accusiing people of things that were never said or insinuated. 

What demonstrates what... what clear reply are you talking about... and if i ignored anything, its simply cause what you were talking about had nothing to do with this thread I can only indulge you so much. Or even worse, that its something I had already explained in this thread before. As I said, I can only indulge you so much. As the say insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. There are only so many ways I can tell you or anyone else what this thread is actually about. Only so many ways. And that of all the posters in this thread only 4 people didn't "get it". And of that four, 2 of them now understand. As for you and the guy above you..... well, I think we have reached a point where its best to say lets just agree to disagree.

You keep talking about simple logic and maths. Yet you have offered nothing but accusations and off topic points. 

For the record, I have listenned to anyone that actually was talking about what I was trying to say in this thread. I have tried to tell those that misunderstood me (which also requires listenning to them by the way) that what they were talking about is not what I meant and tried to clarify. But I am guessing your idea of listenning must entail that I agree with what you are saying, even if what you are saying is accusing me of saying something I am not saying.

Whats really funny about all this, is that if you actually know how simple and starightforward all I am saying is you would probably feel stupid for derailing it all as much as you  have. My even replying you, for so long and considerring how wrong you are, is actually an act of respect to you as a person and the least insulting thing I could do. But no more. If you don't get it by now, you never will. Feel free to keep accusing me of stuff. 

So you never once said "Lol... ok, if you so." or "And if you can get you head in the game" (hint; start at page 10).

I've mentioned benchmarks before...so the issue is that you didn't read my replies carefully. This picture is starting to become more clear. As for being "off the mark", I'm not - I just don't tolerate people making ill informed comments. I don't have to deal with folks like that in real life, so why tolerate them here? ^^ I would make an epic moderator.

What is your point?  Are you defending the points in the OP, wanting people to debate them, or disagreeing with them? Because I've assumed the 1st and 2nd. Also I think your grammar hasn't helped as sometimes it makes your sentences somewhat incoherent which never helps in a debate.