By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Intrinsic said:
Tachikoma said:

Actually my friend, they are, the only two that could really be questioned are the unreal tournament 2014 one and the UT4 tech demo shot, however both were taken in engine, running on a high end pc.

So for all intents and purposes, they are all in game screenshots.

Again, they are not. I am not stupid and nor are most here. Tech demos (or in-engine) in game shots are not in game footage. By that logic I could bring pics of uncharted 4 in here. 

And besides, here we are arguing about it, if you want to be fair, post up in-game footage. with actual in game things going on on screen. Not etch footage designed specifically to show off eye canday that may very well not translate into the final product. Especially the infiltrator unreal demo. You might as well also put the samaritan tech demo released from almost 4 years ago here. which no game has come close to replicating in game I might add. Which is exactly why I say you should use only actual in game footage.

For the record the developers claimed it was directly recorded from a PS4 in engine as you can see in the teaser, it is probably a huge overgrade but still it comes from a PS4, if you're intrested in putting up test demo's than sure pc will win, although the dark sorcerer looks pretty nice. Point is as you claimed even though the potential is there not a single developer has 500.000.000 to spend on a exclusives which comes close to the tech demoes especially not PC games since well they won't be funded by MS. Console exclusives have in most cases a higher budget and can make look significantly better than many of most gamers think, which will lead them to a point in which artstyle will be more important than tech and so console exclusives will remain close to pc visuals on screen.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar