By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

"Well yes, Ubisoft LIED on screenshots posted and videos published so far"

See, this is exactly what my issue is with Ubisoft and this is exactly why they are being hated across many sites... If Ubisoft didn't lie to us and set out expectations high, then no one would be complaining but what do they do? They show us screenshots of this zomfg looking game and then later downgrade them. Does the game still look great? Sure, but does it look as great as it did the first time around? Nope

Oh and there is no way the screenshots justify a 680 as a minimum requirement

And this isn't the first time they did this either... They did the exact same shit with Watch_Dogs and they probably will do the exact same shit with The Division and they deserve all the hate they are getting. I cannot stand when a Corporation lies to its consumers and treats them like idiots

It is so funny that they are telling us to be happy and enjoy the game and graphics isn't everything even though its them that set our expectations so high on the graphical level... Like, if they showed us the actual screenshots, I doubt any of this hate would exist

Its so hard to trust them, at all. Heck, just look at the minimum requirements of some of the other games that are coming out compared to asscreed

  • (2/25/2014) – Thief: GTS 250 minimum/GTX 660 recommended
  • (5/20/2014) – Wolfenstein: GTX 460/GTX 460
  • (5/27/2014) – Watch_Dogs: GTX 460/GTX 560ti
  • (9/30/2014) – Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor: GTX 460/GTX 660
  • (11/03/2014) – Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare: GTS 450/GTX 760
  • (11/11/2014) – Assassin’s Creed: Unity: GTX 680/GTX 780
  • (11/18/2014) – Dragon Age: Inquisition: 8800 GT/GTX 660

DA:I can fucking run on a fucking 8800 GT! And you are telling me that Asscreed requires a fucking 680 as a minimum? That is just so retarded



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850