ethomaz said:
You know any of these game render the full open world but only a small part of it... big or small open world didn't matter for redenring but how you smart render the parts of your game while you are moving... so a open world game 100x bigger than another won't matter if your are using the same code to smart predict the next part to be rendered and the part that will put on trash. You TLOUR comment is biased... tell me what game is better graphicly than TLOUR? You will find few examples... AC for example is not... it is not even close. And AI have nothing to do with rendering 1080... don't fall in the bullshit that Ubisoft told to you to try to "defense" the parity... AI affect only framerate. |
in terms of open world at th emoment? I would say infamous second son, shadow of mordor, destiny. Non open world game -- metro redux, ryseTombe raider definitive edition to name a few. NOt biased, the game was very good. i enjoyed playing it. Its not ugly but you can see the ps3 textures in the game an dbecause it a resolution bump, you can see irt very clearly. For me what stood out the most was the cut scenes which graphics when joel and ellie talks. To me it doesn't look like a p4 or an xbox one game , graphically. Its impressive to have a detailed huge open world with lots of graphical effects and lots of AI in the area which makes the world itself vibrant while maintaining a stable framerate. exactly if the amount of AI in trhe game couldn't maintain a stable framjrate in 1080p with their engine,, wouldn't it be logical to drop it to 900p to keep stable?
