By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
noname2200 said:
Zekkyou said:

It doesn't really matter. Nintendo have total control over them, and the vast majority of the money they generate goes to Nintendo. They're functionally identical to a 1st party. At that point you may as well call them one, regardless to if you believe ownership is "all or nothing" (which is a silly notion, but i lack to energy to argue the point).


Yeah, you know who thought commanding 96% of Europe was "good enough"? Napoleon. How'd that work out for him. As long as there remains pockets outside Nintendo's control, then they're not actually in total control, and therefore they're a third-party. Not first. Not second. Third!!!

You're equating Napoleon to business ownership? Yeah, you're definitely trolling... :p